Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The articles nails it talking about the distribution channels. The small shops that were selling Apples and Ataris refused to carry Commodore computers when they started selling VIC-20s and C-64s at big box stores like Toys R Us. When Commodore had a more powerful, and expensive, computer available, it was too expensive for those stores and they could not support it.



Well those small shops, especially if they carried Apple, probably knew not to offend. Apple was no better to stores than MS was/is to OEMs.


Commodore outsold Apple on the low end by a large factor for many years (and continued to do so in terms of units on a worldwide basis pretty much to the bitter end).

They'd have continued to support Commodore if Commodore didn't continuously mess them around. A major factor was the price war that was to be Jack Tramiel's parting shot: Commodore overnight announced a massive price drop and left their dealers to take the hit on all inventory they already had on hand.

That was typical for Tramiel playing hard-ball but also severely hurt a lot of businesses that had bet on Commodore.

You see the difference when you look at the US market vs. Europe - Europe was handled by subsidiaries that often handled their dealer networks far better. Particularly the UK and Germany were Commodore strongholds. The UK subsidiary actually tried to get financing for a buyout of Commodore International after the bankruptcy, and survived for quite a while on their own financial strength.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: