That.
I have used only ChatGPT and I remember asking 4 legacy to write some code. I asked o3 the same question when it came out, and then I compared the codes. o3 was 'better' more precise, more detailed, less 'crude'. Now, don't get me wrong, crude worked fine. But when I wanted to do the v1.1 and v1.2 o3 nailed it every time, while 4 legacy was simply bad and full of errors.
With that said, I assume that every 'next' version of each engine is using my 'prompts' to train, so each new version has the benefit of having already processed my initial v1.0 and then v1.1 and then v1.2. So it is somewhat 'unfair' because for "ChatGTP v2024" my v1.0 is brand new while for "ChatGTP v2027" my v1.0, v1.1, v1.2 is already in the training dataset.
I haven't used Grok yet, perhaps it's time to pause that OpenAI payment and give Elon some $$$ and see how it works 'for me'.
Europe has been more or less militarily occupied and subjugated for that time. Conquered nations tend to be pretty docile on the international level and generally don't go around waging war independently.
Some insights or decisions cannot or should not be placed on the public, thats why you elect representatives in the firt place. Insight can be granular, like an oversight commitee publishing a redacted report, but i agree on full transparency about anything regarding our representatives.
What you're describing is very similar to what most large enterprise companies do: layers upon layers of red tape and convoluted regulations for the sake of "security."
This is a big reason they can’t get anything done or retain talent.
Government is no different.
European democracies have been dying from the same sclerosis their legacy multinationals have.
The US is going through actual change. The outrage over things not being done as they always have is nonsensical.
He doesn't need to follow that recipe for dictatorship. He just needs to do whatever he wants, being a bully without consequences both internally and externally, transforming the image of the US into an aggressive nation. At this moment Americans are as guilty as Russians for allowing this to happen.
The dogs working at DOGE haven't the idea on what are they looking at and are lying to cover it. I wouldn't count on them exposing anything but their asses.
Are you talking about the politically motivated charge brought by Alvin Bragg where the New York Election Law § 17-152, which prohibits conspiracies to promote or prevent an election by unlawful means was twisted sufficiently enough so that a "hush payment" was deliberately escalated to a felony ?
A judgement that was presided by a well-known anti-Trump judge whose OWN daughter worked for "Authentic Campaigns" - which took significant payments to the tune of millions of dollars from the Biden-Harris campaign - and also $16 million from Schiff ?
What a joke - that conviction truly proved to the entire world that the U.S. is a corrupt BANANA republic and does not possesses the moral authority to preach about "opposition treatment" to nations of the Global South.
The XOR light switch is a trick. And, even if you know it is possible, it is hard to figure it out without someone telling you. My uncle and cousin were doing their own electrical work and couldn’t figure it out.
I had seen the trick as a young kid and remembered it 30 years later: install the one of the switches backwards.
One switch takes in power and puts it on two one of two wires running to the second switch. The second switch connects one of the two wires to the power wire going to the bulb.
If you don’t know the trick, you get an AND switch.
Perhaps I'm not that inteligent myself ;) Then again, I never said it's my country, I'm from Poland. I could give Polish-specific examples of extremy stupidity, but the flat earth example I find the least controversial.
Anyone can do whatever they want regardless of the rules. However, presidents do not have impunity. Presidents and their EOs can be held accountable by Congress and the courts.
> It is a pretty interesting thought experiment to wonder whether people shouldn't be allowed to engage in organized sports that are risky, without paying an additional health insurance premium? E.g. if you play professional football, then your league has to pay extra money into the health insurance fund to compensate for all the extra health care treatment their players need and will need.
Isn't this already in use in multiple countries? I.e. if you want to play football (european) in a league, you have to have a license and also insurance that covers playing it in an organized way - for example in a league.
So team sports are already covered by such things, but individual sports like mountain biking or skiing aren't at the moment.
Yeah, this seems concerning to me. Maybe now as the platform is new this isn't much of an issue. But as accounts go inactive people will naturally collect "dead" accounts that they are still following. On Facebook it isn't uncommon of to have old accounts of sociable people naturally collect thousands of friends.
It seems that what they are trying to measure is "busy timelines" and it seems bag they could probably measure that more directly. For example what is the number of posts in the timeline over theast 24h? It seems that it should be fairly easy to use this as the metric for calculating drop rate.
Sure, EOs have been a scourge for decades, not just this one. They are commonly used to contradict what is written in law or extending their powers, such as choosing not to enforce. This is nothing new.
Most of the animosity comes from misunderstanding.
Trump tasked "DOGE" with reviewing government spending across it's 400+ agencies, and coming up with recommendations on how to reduce wasteful spending. They have 1 year to complete this task.
To make sensible recommendations, DOGE needs data about the major programs within each agency. They can't tackle each agency consecutively, since there are more agencies than days until the deadline, so they are parallelising the work.
The access is read only, and they are not linking personal data between agencies, but rather doing a bunch of separate audits in parallel.
Trump has prohibited Musk from being involved in with the review in agencies where he was a material conflict (FAA for example).
I recently got fined for having backyard chickens within 100 feet of a neighboring residence. That's the ordinance, and I can't meet it in a low density neighborhood.
Fuck the city. I still have chickens and will continue to have them.
How is that talking past you? You regretted that meat from wild caught animals or those shot to protect crops isn't sold, and that factory farming presents a health hazard, and I agreed with both points. I could accept a charge of being vacuous, since I didn't add anything, but I wasn't ignoring your words. I agreed with you, and I'll do it again.
With that said, I assume that every 'next' version of each engine is using my 'prompts' to train, so each new version has the benefit of having already processed my initial v1.0 and then v1.1 and then v1.2. So it is somewhat 'unfair' because for "ChatGTP v2024" my v1.0 is brand new while for "ChatGTP v2027" my v1.0, v1.1, v1.2 is already in the training dataset.
I haven't used Grok yet, perhaps it's time to pause that OpenAI payment and give Elon some $$$ and see how it works 'for me'.