Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Congrats on their big launch! This is very exciting for their Android users! I'm not going to lie, as an iOS user I'm quite jealous. Ha This gives Android users quite a bit more tiggers available for them that iOS users can't do. The iOS app can only do basic things like calendar, contacts, and photos. Things such as "sending a text as yourself", changing settings on your phone, etc. are awesome features they added for Android that I wish iOS also offered. But I do understand the nature of iOS being more locked down than Android.

Sort of off topic, but I wonder if IFTTT will ever start charging for their services. I'm a huge fan of what they do, and it surprises me that they have stayed free for this long. Similar services (more directed towards tech) like Zapier [1] have very fair pricing plans, but their free plan is so-so. I would be more than willing to pay for the awesome work that IFTTT is doing with their platform. Just wonder if they will ever introduce pricing plans into their service or not.

[1] https://zapier.com/




I use IFTTT to send myself multiple text messages a day, to which I respond and log the results in a Google Doc spreadsheet. Each month I blast past the 100 message limit. I've asked IFTTT to let me pay them for more messages but they said no.


Use Twilio, and have a stub of code inject your responses into your Google Docs spreadsheet. 1 penny per text message they receive for you, $1/month for the number.

Here, just found this blog post via the googles:

https://www.twilio.com/blog/2012/11/connecting-twilio-sms-to...

https://github.com/jpf/TwilioSheet


Thanks! This may be the impetus I've been waiting for to make the switch.


No problem. Working on getting you a promo code so your number and a bucket of texts are free for testing.


To clarify, you are blocked from sending over 100? Or you are going over said "limit" anyway?


Hey! Great insights. I work for Zapier, so I'm totally bias. :-) I'm curious to hear more about what makes the free plan so-so?


Hey Chris! I don't want to go and derail this post, but I'd be more than happy to give you feedback if you want to email me (contact is on my HN profile)! :)


It should be possible for IFTTT to send an SMS with the user's number as sender without involving the phone at all. Which might be preferable anyway, as it doesn't rely on your phone being reachable when an event is triggered.

Not sure how much it would cost per message and whether it's feasible for a free service like IFTT, but it can be done.


You are unable to spoof SMS numbers. Twilio has documentation on this if you'd like more info (experience: I tried, so I could SMS birthday messages to my contacts without remembering, but having it look like it came from me).


You're absolutely able to spoof SMS numbers from a technical standpoint, but you'll have to go straight to an SMSC or aggregator that lets you do it.

I haven't checked in years, but we had to write an SMPP library to pull it off. That sucked.


I should have qualified my statement.


Is that really possible? I've wanted to do that before and looked into Twilio but it's basically number spoofing and would make spamming people far too easy.

If you've found a way, I'd love to hear it


There are services that can do this (Skype, for example) but on closer inspection, looks like it's not allowed in some territories (including the US).

https://support.skype.com/en/faq/FA672/how-do-i-show-my-mobi...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMS_spoofing


Twilio lets you deliver SMS from a number other than your Twilio number. The one caveat is that you need to have Twilio verify the external number first, two-factor auth style.

EDIT: Oops, apparently this is only for voice calling: http://www.twilio.com/help/faq/phone-numbers/whats-the-diffe...




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: