I've been really frustrated by the "purchase only" digital options for movies lately. I want to watch the US remake of "The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo" but I don't know if I want to watch it more than once.
I'm a little confused. This community (myself included) often complains about how we wish Hollywood would release their movies as DRM-free files. But then some of us say that the "purchase" price is too high and we want a "rental" option.
How exactly would this work? Would the movie studios ask you nicely to remove the file from your computer after three days? I'd love to hear a technical answer that contradicts this, but don't see how a DRM-free rental could ever be possible.
I don't see in that thread anyone asking for DRM free rental movies. It started out talking about the availability of the movie on Google Play and ended with the frustration of a lack of a rental option. The topic shifted just a bit there.
I don't really see how you could rent streaming movies without some form of DRM in place. I would hope no one expects that.
I'm not part of the "All DRM is always bad. No exceptions" consensus group. I'm in the more pragmatic "I'm OK with DRM, especially for time-limited rentals when it works well and is really cheap" group.
Yep, i like both the amazon and itunes rental options for movies. Most movies are a one time deal anyway, and they are FAR cheaper than going to a theater for "meh" movies.
For buying I would like the drm to go bye-bye. They can watermark it for all I care, as long as its a plain file with no drm is what I want for the purchase price so I can move it about like the songs I buy from amazon/itunes. That is basically my viewpoint as well.
No. If you don't return the physical media then chances are they'll charge you the full price, not allow you to rent again, and/or track you down because you most likely gave them your contact info.