>I'm also not going to start discussing legal issues with random internet people who I seriously suspect are paid actors and/or have been riled up by them.
Oh boy, everyone who disagrees with me works for the Kremlin.
> Treasury, in consultation with the Department of State, has issued a new determination under Executive Order (E.O.) 14071, which prohibits the supply to any person in the Russian Federation of (1) IT consultancy and design services; and (2) IT support services and cloud-based services for enterprise management software and design and manufacturing software. The determination will take effect on September 12, 2024.
Alternatively we can continue like normal because not much of value will be lost. Git is inherently decentralized. If A requires work by C they can pull it directly or B can pull from C and A from B.
There is no inherent issue with C's contributions coming in by way of B especially if B vetted and examined said contributions personally.
Not a great answer since I was saying your claim specifically didn't apply to him, i.e. one person. Look at the logic of this conversation, a paraphrased version of the actual one we had:
---
Submission: Jack the firefighter says x
You: All people who say x must be crazy or being paid
Me: In this case Jack's claims likely have merit
You: So anyone that says x is paid? Where's my check?
Sigh. I didn't misunderstand anything, I specifically said in this particular instance his claims might be valid, in contrast to your outright dismissal of them.
What a frustrating and pointless discussion because you were so set on misunderstanding something so simple. No wonder your comments are getting flagged.
Oh boy, everyone who disagrees with me works for the Kremlin.