Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It doubt that, because it requires 12.5 % more bits to be stored, with corresponding increase in cost.

ECC also doesn’t fully protect against Rowhammer, in particular if errors remain unreported: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18508692




I think GP is talking about DDR5 "on-die ECC".


The percent increase depends on how many bits you're protecting in a group. It can be a lot smaller.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: