So first of all, good on you for publishing your work - the thing more important than anything else is that you do - the rest of the conversation about feedback, outcomes etc is interesting but only matters once you have actually published / shipped. So get that done first, don't overthink it beforehand.
A few other comments have mentioned that you really shouldn't expect anyone to care, and from those that do you should expect the majority of feedback to be negative - disagreements and nitpicks, etc.
This is absolutely true and you should embrace it! I wrote a blogpost [0] about that which you might enjoy. That's one of my blogposts that did actually 'hit' and got to the front page of HN. You'll see in my blog that I've written a few that have. You'll also notice that my most recent post has not and if you review my submission history you'll see that I've really really tried to get it to! Including title changes, etc. I like it just as much as any other post I've written, but have concluded at this point that HN, or at least the people who review posts on the new page, just don't care about it or find it interesting. That's fine!
If you review my submission history you'll also notice that my open source library react-frontload is a similar story. It's got about 450 github stars and a reasonable amount of people use it in their projects, but it's never, ever 'hit' on HN or anywhere else. Again, that is fine! I post it anyway every so often just to get it out there (I genuinely think it's a good tool and want people to find it!) but never really expect a different outcome to be honest. And I am sure even if it did hit, a majority of the feedback would be negative (and some of that quite useful).
That's all to say, keep the expectation of nobody caring and negative feedback for most of everything you publish because that's mostly what you'll get. Occasionally, you'll be pleasantly surprised by something hitting, but I don't think that there is any particular strategy to it other than the obvious thing of trying to publish only things you think are genuinely useful and of course, just actually publishing!
A few other comments have mentioned that you really shouldn't expect anyone to care, and from those that do you should expect the majority of feedback to be negative - disagreements and nitpicks, etc.
This is absolutely true and you should embrace it! I wrote a blogpost [0] about that which you might enjoy. That's one of my blogposts that did actually 'hit' and got to the front page of HN. You'll see in my blog that I've written a few that have. You'll also notice that my most recent post has not and if you review my submission history you'll see that I've really really tried to get it to! Including title changes, etc. I like it just as much as any other post I've written, but have concluded at this point that HN, or at least the people who review posts on the new page, just don't care about it or find it interesting. That's fine!
If you review my submission history you'll also notice that my open source library react-frontload is a similar story. It's got about 450 github stars and a reasonable amount of people use it in their projects, but it's never, ever 'hit' on HN or anywhere else. Again, that is fine! I post it anyway every so often just to get it out there (I genuinely think it's a good tool and want people to find it!) but never really expect a different outcome to be honest. And I am sure even if it did hit, a majority of the feedback would be negative (and some of that quite useful).
That's all to say, keep the expectation of nobody caring and negative feedback for most of everything you publish because that's mostly what you'll get. Occasionally, you'll be pleasantly surprised by something hitting, but I don't think that there is any particular strategy to it other than the obvious thing of trying to publish only things you think are genuinely useful and of course, just actually publishing!
[0] https://davnicwil.com/negative-feedback-is-positive/