Just because you don't invite people over to your place doesn't meant that I don't. In fact, I do, regularly.
Also, if you put the pieces together, the fact that you have a device around that you're comfortable reading on most of the time doesn't mean that I do. My phone is a terrible device for reading on (as is my laptop, honestly), and the only one that I have around as often as I have a book in my bag.
Giving someone a book has an emotional connotation that loaning someone something on an electronic service does not. That may change in future generations, but for me, and my ilk (most of whom also don't read books on electronic devices), giving someone a physical book means far more than loaning them something with an internet service.
I have no problem that in your social environment that Kindle books are superior to physical books. But you said that you can't understand why anyone else would prefer physical books, and it seems the simple explanation is that, well, everyone isn't you.
I edited out some of my previous comments where I mentioned "I don't understand why people still like books" before you replied. What I mean is "I like the e-book experience so much that I'd be surprised if most people who switched over didn't feel the same way." It's a subjective thing to say, but I've been a heavy user of both paperbacks and now e-books. If you try the Kindle reader out, you might be pleasantly surprised by the experience (or maybe not, but the main thing I was trying to understand from this is whether the OP had tried it and disliked it, having a preference for paperbacks).
You are ignoring most of the reasons wheels gave you. He said an e-book is harder for sharing, cannot be stored in a physical location and requires a theft prone device that makes the owner look nerdy. He also said he prefers the sensory experience of a book to that of a device. Your evangelism addresses only the last point and your premise - wheels is unfamiliar with modern e-readers - appears without basis.
Sorry, I think I'm coming off as an evangelist when the reason I replied specifically to wheels is because I know him personally and it was intended as a personal recommendation to try out since I had many of the same complaints as him a few months ago. He saw the earlier version of my comment, and I edited that out before he wrote his response (and my first thought was the wrong one, and not really worded the way I intended it to be, so he called me out on that and he was right).
I'm not trying to sell anyone on it, I'm more interested in seeing if people switch back after they've tried it. That would be more interesting to me.
Just because you don't invite people over to your place doesn't meant that I don't. In fact, I do, regularly.
Also, if you put the pieces together, the fact that you have a device around that you're comfortable reading on most of the time doesn't mean that I do. My phone is a terrible device for reading on (as is my laptop, honestly), and the only one that I have around as often as I have a book in my bag.
Giving someone a book has an emotional connotation that loaning someone something on an electronic service does not. That may change in future generations, but for me, and my ilk (most of whom also don't read books on electronic devices), giving someone a physical book means far more than loaning them something with an internet service.
I have no problem that in your social environment that Kindle books are superior to physical books. But you said that you can't understand why anyone else would prefer physical books, and it seems the simple explanation is that, well, everyone isn't you.