But if vaccines are refused, doesn’t that meant they didn’t consider the virus last year a big risk? Not even flu level risk, they consider it a common cold type risk?
They can’t have it both ways, if they want to be taken seriously they can’t play up the risk they put themselves in due to a virus they don’t believe is risky enough to warrant a free fda approved vaccine that prevents the risk. This how they appear to be treating it. That is not logically consistent.
On the other hand, the hospitals consider the virus risky and want people vaccinated or not exposed, so it’s logically consistent to not allow their workers to take unnecessary risks.
Edit: The “I know that’s true and have no reply but I can’t acknowledge that fact so I’m downvoting” type downvotes show a point well made. Got to cancel it lest other people read it!
They are immune from having had it originally so of course the risk is different from one point to the other. No inconsistency except for the fact that reality changed for them through the magic of bodily reaction.
They can’t have it both ways, if they want to be taken seriously they can’t play up the risk they put themselves in due to a virus they don’t believe is risky enough to warrant a free fda approved vaccine that prevents the risk. This how they appear to be treating it. That is not logically consistent.
On the other hand, the hospitals consider the virus risky and want people vaccinated or not exposed, so it’s logically consistent to not allow their workers to take unnecessary risks.
Edit: The “I know that’s true and have no reply but I can’t acknowledge that fact so I’m downvoting” type downvotes show a point well made. Got to cancel it lest other people read it!