Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Doesn't Chrome send your entire browsing history to Google as well?

Edit: I thought this was a well know fact and if it isn't I might have been to harsh about Google and Chrome.

Edit 2: Thinking about it and searching a bit I conclude that IIRC Google at least used to have access to your browsing history as part of syncing it unencrypted.




Only through sync, which you can encrypt with a separate password to your Google account.

My sync is encrypted so I can't test this for you but I believe if it's not, you can check (and clear) your history here: https://myactivity.google.com/myactivity

Google's privacy policy seems to make it clear that this happens unless encryption is turned on: https://www.google.com/chrome/privacy/index.html#signed-in


you missed the obvious one (that is actually related to the linked edge issue): SafeBrowse. SafeBrowse gets ALL your traffic from most browsers.


Ah I was wrong about this!!! SafeBrowse uses hashes.

Edit: never be afraid to admit your were wrong folks :) So it only gets a “potential list” of sites you visited. Wonder if the operators could aggregate the data enough to deanonymize things


The hash isn't even necessarily transmitted, and it's often partial hashes at that.


> Doesn't Chrome send your entire browsing history to Google as well?

Most browsers/users do, essentially. When a person searches Google for example, results are links to Google that redirect to the target sites. Try it, mouse over a result, and look at the URL. Then a user clicks on one and finds a page that likely has doubleclick.net/adsense/analytics/fonts, which all feed back to Google. Or buttons/pixels/whatever for Facebook. Or both. Or both and 10 more organizations. Then since all mainstream browsers by default send referrer info, and since tracker code is so pervasive, and since browsers are easily fingerprintable, trackers follow you along as you click links going from page to page. Trackers are getting redundant high quality data. They're right there with you as you browse; they see what you see. Although some browsers are easier to configure for privacy, IMO the browser you use is less important than how you use it.

Multiple organizations have the potential to possess a near-complete view of your browsing history.


Everything you type into the address bar gets considered for possible completion, right? And part of that quite possibly entails sending it off to Google servers which take a stab at finding completions for it. Your claim seems plausible at least.


Yes, there are some options under chrome://privacy/settings that suggest they send full or partial URLs:

- Use a web service to help resolve navigation errors

- Use a prediction service to help complete searches and URLs typed in the address bar

and then there's

- Use a web service to help resolve spelling errors

whose description suggests it sends more than URLs.


And, if I recall right, you're asked if you want search suggestions in the omnibar the first time you use it for that purpose.


Does that prompt effectively explain its impact to nontechnical users?


Also note there is a “roulette” feature in most address bars, where the browser starts loading and rendering the site before you ever hit submit. Very handy for sites wanting to pursue persistence


My activity[0] is Google's official way of telling you what it has collected about you from sources like Chrome. Things there will be used to personalize your experience.

https://myactivity.google.com/myactivity


If you are logged into Chrome your history is synchronized across platforms, tied to your Google account. Same as with Firefox Sync. Not sure about behavior when not logged in, or when incognito.


Firefox Sync is quite different than Chrome's version; with Firefox your data is encrypted locally on your machine before it is synced.


That is also an option for Chrome.


But not the default.


Are you sure about that? Certainly at least some of the synced information is encrypted before sync by default (passwords).


I would love to see a source for this.


It is not so easy to do this MITM trick with Chrome, it has Google certs pinned down.

"For the transparent proxy to work, it needs .google.com to be added to the URL whitelist to allow all traffic to .google.com. This configuration is not supported because of Chrome security features that are in place, and we recommend that you avoid the use of transparent proxies." https://support.google.com/chrome/a/answer/3504942?hl=en


This link refers to Chrome devises, like Chromebooks, not to the Chrome browser.


You'll be getting "ERR_SSL_PROTOCOL_ERROR". I could not find any posts on internet that were able to MITM and analyse Chrome to google.com traffic.


If you sign in it syncs history across devices, so I assume it does. Although it would technically be possible that they encrypt it using a key Google doesn't have, I wouldn't assume they implemented that.


It's an option under the sync settings:

Encrypt synced passwords with your Google username and password

Encrypt synced data with your own sync passphrase




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: