Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | zachgersh's comments login

The GOPROXY API being either , or | makes me a tiny bit sad. Now, what was once simple, has given these characters new and not easily discernible semantic meaning. I really wish I had commented on this proposal but missed it until the feature was already in.


What would propose as an alternative? Even if it's too late for this particular thing, I'm curious anyway as there are similar problems that crop up here and there at $dayhob


RE: modules and vendoring, you should no longer have to worry about a package going away now that proxies have been introduced (the default proxy right now being proxy.golang.org).

You should be able to pull all your modules from a proxy, minus any private repos you control (which you can either setup our own proxy for OR set The GOPROXY var to go direct to vcs for it).

Also, not vendoring should give you a smaller repo and build speed shouldn’t suffer too much (proxy caching and such).


modules and vendoring is still a pain and I don't want or need a network resource to build my code. If a vendor directory is present, use it!

While things are better in Go 1.14, it is not solved. I do not want to set up a company proxy for our private repos. I can't count how many times some combination of GOPROXY, private repos, vendoring, and modules have been a problem.


Ah good point about GOPROXY.

So if I have a mix of private and public dependencies that I pull in, can I specify a specific proxy for the private ones? Is it the GOPRIVATE env var?


The proxy should maintain a copy of all dependencies (public and private), so only one should be necessary.


This should be clarified, if you setup YOUR OWN proxy it can handle both public and private modules (side note I haven’t been able to verify this yet with artifactory).

You can also just let your GOPROXY fallback go “direct” which will then go straight to vcs (you need to make sure you have a gitconfig setup to redirect https to ssh).


For those on the West Coast, well LA, we actually have access to incredible hot chicken in Howlin' Rays. The chicken definitely stays true to the Nashville original and they have the lines to prove it (peak is like 3 hours).



To give Howlin Ray's some credit, they did a pop-up night here in Nashville with 400 Degrees (one of the highest regarded places) and it was incredibly packed and successful. Next time I'm in LA, I will be at Howlin Rays!


Not sure if things have calmed down in the last year, but get ready for 2-3 hour lines.


i went to howlin rays a few times when it opened (the line was “only” 15-30 mins long then). it’s delicious but the line is way too long now to go regularly. i switched to dave’s for a while but that’s now got a long line too. luckily new options have popped up and maybe will tame those crazy lines at howlin rays eventually.


A whole handful because they all bring something different to the table:

- Dishonored 2 - The Witness - The Talos Principal - Batman - Arkham Knight - Shadows of Mordor - Transistor


My favorite tweet about the whole situation: https://twitter.com/objective_neo/status/736530568222015489


Maybe the future is in these over-glorified social media lifestyle companies acquiring or bailing out "worthy" startups working on "hard problems". Sort of like how ad-funded Google is investing in health longevity research and the like.

The future is going to be funded from the largesse of dumb app companies, because the public would rather fund dumb app companies than rocket ship firms.


That or because it's more profitable to do so, especially on a risk-adjusted basis? What's with the negativity around funding apps if they create tangible value? What makes them "dumb"?

If you believe there's some amazing untapped opportunity in funding rocket ship companies, then perhaps you should raise some money from LPs and invest in rocket ship companies.


The amount it's valued at seriously blows my mind. Like this is an app that's main features are sending 10 second videos and images.


Complexity does not correlate to value. All my friends use Snapchat and no one uses Facebook.


High tech has become more marketing and less tech.


Considering the state of the snapchat app on android, I absolutely agree.


Can you elaborate on the state? (I never used SnapChat, but I am on Android.)


For one, I read in an HN thread that Snapchat Android doesn't actually use the camera API for the phone, it just screenshots the screen.


That was my sentiment five years ago for Instagram.

9 Apr 2012

2008:Sun buys MySQL for $1B. 2012:Facebook buys Instagram for $1B. DB tech running half the web+revenue vs hipster photo filter app+no rev.


I saw pretty easily how Instagram could be worth a billion to FB, who has a social network and wants to expand their user base / stop competition from rising.

I don't understand how these shares that pay no dividend and give no voting power are worth $24 each. They are basically "SnapChat Fun Bucks." Anyone buying it just hoping another person down the line will pay more for it. On top of that, we know there's a large number of people holding it (employees) that are going to start selling their shares over the next year.

I just don't get how this has any value at all.


Short it if you truly believe the stock will go down. Easy money ;).


I'm humble (and risk averse) enough to admit I could be wrong. But it baffles me.


To be fair, you didn't take into account the difference that $1B was worth between those times. Not just inflation, but the economic situation in 2008 as well.


You can probably get pretty far with the package written by Russ Cox:

https://github.com/rsc/letsencrypt



Not a full course (apologies in advance) but I have heard a lot of people get a good introduction from:

http://compilers.iecc.com/crenshaw/

It was written with Turbo Pascal in mind but many have read the text and transcribed the instructions to a language of their choosing. Should be at least a good introduction to compilers.


No need for any apologies. I am looking for anything that can introduce me to the topic along with practical knowledge



If you wanted both a platform and an OSS approach why not just deploy something like ghost:

https://ghost.org

I like supporting OSS business models that allow me to host my own platform or just post my content to their hosted version of said platform.


Recently switched to using these at work for quick notes (before they are transferred somewhere else):

http://www.myboogieboard.com/shop/store/original

Heavily writing focused and the newer ones actually sync your notes to an app as needed.

Having used it for a few weeks now, definitely one of my favorite devices of 2016 and I really appreciate the singular focus it has as a device.


> definitely one of my favorite devices of 2016

These devices are at least 3 years old.

Honestly, the fact that I can only erase the whole board and not a small section is a deal breaker for me. As is the form factor.

Make them as big as a small whiteboard, add local erase features and they've got a winner.

While we're at that, they could manufacture boogie board whiteboard replacements. That would be a hit in all teaching institutions. Imagine: No more markers or chalk. One click erase.


I went through high school in the mid 00s, and just recently graduated from college. Every classroom I've been in for the past 10 years has had a "smart board", which is basically a giant whiteboard with touch recognition. They have "markers" you can pick up and write on the screen with, and an eraser that lets you erase what you've written. They were very successful, and incredibly useful- plus teachers could save the images they drew and then put them up for the class to access later.

Where I work now we have one as well- except instead of a projector it's just a big LCD touchscreen.


I should have been more specific, favorite device I've used in 2016 not that came out in 2016.

Would love giant size Boogie boards for the office.


I have been WAITING for ride-sharing pickups to be available from LAX for what feels like ages. They've actually implemented a pretty sane system - ride sharing services have marked areas that they can pickup from but they can drop off anywhere. You request a car and the ask what marked area you are near, then they show up there, it doesn't get much easier.

Taxis still aren't focused on the customer in LA and I don't think they will ever be.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: