good point, though a great LLM answer would DWIM here and explain both interpretations as you have done here, as opposed to (what presumably happened) focus on one and ignore the other.
of course not. When you go through airport security, they give you trays where you put your backpack, laptop, and shoes. Happens every day with no problem.
It doesn't cause any problems. I used the phrase for poetic flourish. Aside from the general rough treatment of being quickly unpacked and packed again in a hurry. In the past there were a lot of urban legends going around about airport x-ray scanners harming hard drives, but in reality, they're harmless.
> xAI was relatively separated from X and TSLA, and wasn't having the backlashes associated with the two.
I don't understand this point: why would these backlashes care about the on-paper separation? (I'm assuming by backlash, you mean that of public opinion, which already knows about the xAI-Musk association).
I wasn't trying to refute it; I was adding information: The quote didn't mention or imply that there are also single-cell eukaryotes, so I added that detail.
> Finally, state your main point/purpose up front. For everything, every section, every paragraph. Gets attention. Filters readers by relevance. Assists clarity & brevity.
My grad school advisor said to me that "the first N sentences should be the most import N sentences" when writing papers
the most recent version has `import std;` in the very first hello world, which to my knowledge is not close to working in the vast majority of compilers.
Information Systems and Technology Management
I've also never heard anyone say this though, but I'm guessing that's what they meant.
reply