Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | toivo's commentslogin

Do you want to elaborate on why Athena Crisis is better than Wargroove in your opinion?


I don't know if it is objectively better but I like it better.


So the next move is to train chat GPT like language model out of the data from whatsapp, facebook and instagram.

Gee, what could go wrong?


Too bad in a big project the recompile and asset reload times get annoying in Unity, even with assembly definitions. In one project I used a runtime lua interpreter on top of C# to speed up game scripting.


Your experience is subjective and unique to you and so is for everyone else. That's why there's no point to use some objective metric to rate entertainment anyways. I don't generally like modern movies or TV as well, and I feel some what entitled to that opinion.


These made me laugh so much.


Assassins have existed way longer than bitcoin. It's emergent feature of free trade. I definately think the upsides of freetrade out weigh the downsides. On the contrary, if we lived in a society where all flow of money goes through some govement entity, we would be in reality some button presses away from Orwell style dystopia.


> I definately think the upsides of freetrade out weigh the downsides

Why? Why is it better to actively facilitate the act of paying an assassin than it is to not do that?

> if we lived in a society where all flow of money goes through some govement entity

Lovely strawman you've built there. However, I don't think I claimed that all money should flow through some government entity. For the record, I don't think it should. Making the act of paying for an assassination illegal != making some government entity responsible for the flow of all money. Holding both the assassin and the payer responsible for either killing somebody or conspiring to kill somebody doesn't seem unreasonable to me.

> we would be in reality some button presses away from Orwell style dystopia.

[citation needed] go work in government and then tell me that anything is "some button presses away" from anything else.


> Why is it better to actively facilitate the act of paying an assassin than it is to not do that?

for assassinations, may be we currently all agree that it isn't good to allow it to happen. However, that is only just an extreme example, for which it is something most people would agree should be illegal. But what about other actions?

Killing the ability to transact, regardless of the subject of a transaction, is detrimental to change, and entrenches existing powers/authority. These existing authority should not feel safe implementing new laws, if there are ways that could circumvent them. This makes the authority remain honest, and only implement laws that would have popular support.


> These existing authority should not feel safe implementing new laws, if there are ways that could circumvent them.

You have successfully convinced me that you’re either a parody account or GPT-4 in training. This is insane.


Here in Finland there was interesting example where someone was selling hitman services over tor-network. They caught him because he left a plastic bag in the crime scene, the plastic bag had a sticker, from that they could tell that it had been used to weight a banana and could also pin down the place and a time. They then used the surveillance footage in store to identify the person.


Reduce reuse recycle


I worked in a game company that used discord. I much prefer it to slack.


(now that our trust has been betrayed)

Is Discord structured in a way that would prevent them ransoming all your stuff years into a project like this?


Besides being less buggy, how is discord better for tech comms?


Shotcut is unfortunately no different. Having used shotcut for hundreds of hours ctrl+s becomes your best friend.


Nowadays, they do have option to use incremental garbage collector which in theory alleviates frame spikes.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: