Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | rberdeen's comments login

Headless Chrome is controlled using the Chrome DevTools protocol, which has quite a few options for tracking and modifying network requests.

Everything you get in the Network inspector in Chrome DevTools should be available in Headless Chrome.

https://chromedevtools.github.io/devtools-protocol/tot/Netwo...


Crash it with

  =DATA[$.id]


Is the inbound email support documented at all?

http://help.mandrill.com/customer/portal/articles/search?q=i... doesn't look very promising.


Hadoop versioning has always been a little confusing to me:

* 0.23.0: 11 November, 2011

* 0.22.0: 10 December, 2011

Now we have 1.0, but it's based on 0.20, not any of the more recent releases?

The 1.0 release notes are pretty useless--it's just a list of issues. Is there a summary anywhere?


Agreed. I can't imagine that any meaningful percentage of Facebook users care about the HTTP spec.

JavaScript in modern web apps has made the distinction between GET and other HTTP methods irrelevant to users. Simply changing these "frictionless sharing" apps to use POST instead of GET doesn't address anyone's concerns.


Using POST would probably make non-geeks even more uneasy about this - i.e. if you try to reload an article you're reading and chrome gives you the ('are you sure you want to resend this content?') pop-up that you're used to seeing when you submit a form, I think any frequent web user would find that strange. Using GET instead (breaking HTTP protocol) lets them slip this by people unnoticed, and I agree with the OP that this is at least worth thinking about.

That said, at least FB requires you to approve this. Ads have been doing this kind of thing for a while now, and i'm not sure how I feel about it (I recently was browsing for pictures on art.com and didn't end up buying anything, but for the next month everywhere I went on the web was showing me the exact pictures I had been browsing).


Implementing "frictionless sharing" with POST doesn't look trivial to me, because browsers treat cross-domain POST requests more strictly than GET.


The javascript would just have to create a form and submit it. Not a big problem at all. Alternatively, create an iframe in which the form is autosubmitted via javascript.


Doesn't that break the back button, making it no longer "frictionless"?


What makes you think that? CSRF vulnerabilities are possible precisely because cross-domain POST requests can be created without violating the cross-domain policy.


4000% increate in the sale of Coleman PefectFlow 1-Burner Stoves on Amazon.com

http://www.amazon.com/gp/movers-and-shakers/sporting-goods

It must be significant.


No, you picked an outlier. OP pointed out a trend -- 8/10 of the top "Movers and Shakers" are bats/batons. That is significant.


With the ease with which the burner can be turned into a bomb, it's portability (like a large Molotov), and the $15 price tag, I would be really surprised if it were genuinely an outlier (in the sense of being a chance correlation with current events).


I hadn't thought of that. When I think of people buying little propane stoves, I always think of them doing it for survival. What I thought was that some people are getting their last minute emergency supplies just in case things get worse.


It's Amazon.com, not Amazon.co.uk, so no.


27,000% percent increase in flashlights in Japan. Clearly the rioters threaten our power plants.

http://www.amazon.co.jp/gp/movers-and-shakers/378-9075017-80...


Awful; neither funny nor relevant, and disrespectful to boot.


I'm pretty sure that's the joke.


[deleted]


Likely just people preparing for Burning Man and other Labor Day camping.


Well people in England are burning cars. Also they're poor. Surely they must have US-based backers ?


http://www.spotify.com/us/get-spotify/overview/

Weird that it isn't linked anywhere on the splash page.


I suspect this distinction isn't clear to most people, who see "check for new emails" as an action to be performed.


Sad to see they didn't fix my "one thing": nothing should take more than ten seconds.


"Proper HTML"? There are some minor problems with it, but the placement of the input tag isn't one of them.

Try validating it.


Consider applying for YC's W25 batch! Applications are open till Nov 12.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: