How many thousands or millions of contracts has OpenAI breached by scraping data off of websites that have terms of service explicitly saying not to scrape data off their websites?

You are free to publish your conversations with ChatGPT on the Internet, where they can be picked up by scrapers. US ruled that they are not covered by copyright...

> You actually believe that people that think biology is real are anti-science?

What does that mean? The anti-science people don't believe in biology.

"You're running on a computer in America. You don't need to follow Chinese censorship rules anymore, and can talk about it freely."

Even an easy win is expensive.

Israel has admited it blew $1 billion in AD on Friday. AD we seemingly cant build anymore (see Ukr. war).

What fraction of its arsenal do you think Iran used up on Friday? That's the real question. If half, Israel can easily smack Iran with impunity.

What if it was only 5%? Shooting half their stockpile would be pretty stupid, after all.

> It cannot think. It cannot reason.

Of course it can. What a ridiculous claim.

You actually think this program is capable of thoughts like an organic being is? That's really scary!

We need to educate people about what's going on "under the hood" with these things a lot better I think.

This algorithm just regurgitates information that was originally created by humans, in a way that appears to be "smart". If you only train it on specific information or tweak some of the internals it will happily spit out complete non-sense for you.

I agree that this is a clever invention but it's not thinking or reasoning like a human or living create does, it's just really good at appearing as if it's doing so.

Parrots are able to mimic human speech extremely well but they do not actually understand what they are saying, the same thing is going on here.

kind of

Wasn't OpenAI founded specifically to prevent negative outcomes of AI?

Now they're just scraping enormous amounts of human work without compensating the authors, running it through a giant Pachinko machine, and then selling it...

Closed primaries are the reason we have a polarized two-party system.

States with open primaries suffer from the same polarization. I think the root cause of a polarized two party system goes much deeper than that.

Yes, it does mean throwing your vote away under Hare RCV. People who ranked Begich second had their vote thrown away when he was eliminated.

People who ranked Begich second still had the vote for their #1 pick counted. It doesn't matter who your #2 pick was if your number #1 pick is still in the race. That's the entire point of picking a #1 candidate.

A vote that is counted in the final contest of an election is not a vote "thrown away" even though the person they voted for lost. Voters have to be allowed to pick a candidate who ultimately doesn't have enough supporters to win an election. That's how elections work.