Don't be so patronizing. The film visualizes a possible society where the line between genetic therapy and genetic enhancement is crossed.
From a bioethical perspective, this isn't "Anti-vaxxing", it deals with misconceptions of genetic predeterminism in humans. Sure you can minimize harm by preventing a child born with tay sachs (genetic therapy) - but you're not minimizing harm by picking a child that will be taller and have blue eyes (enhancement) just because they're statistically likely to be more successful in life.
The main character's roommate provided this contrast as a "failed" olympic athlete, whose life was chosen before he was born.
From a bioethical perspective, this isn't "Anti-vaxxing", it deals with misconceptions of genetic predeterminism in humans. Sure you can minimize harm by preventing a child born with tay sachs (genetic therapy) - but you're not minimizing harm by picking a child that will be taller and have blue eyes (enhancement) just because they're statistically likely to be more successful in life.
The main character's roommate provided this contrast as a "failed" olympic athlete, whose life was chosen before he was born.