Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Detached houses could end up costing far more in maintenance. From experience.



One time maintenance fees versus monthly HOA fees that you are required to pay.


That's true, but only in the most naïve sense.

A house starts falling apart as soon as it's put together... and it keeps falling it apart, and you have to keep putting it back together. The distribution of expenses is lumpier with a house than with a condo, but it's certanly an ongoing cash outflow.


Toronto is mostly made up of 100-year-old brick houses, so the maintenance is mostly soft stuff like painting, gardening, etc. unless you do major renovations.

My last house I did, essentially, zero maintenance over a 10-year span except for a drain replacement ($2K). Every other expense was month to month expenses like heating and electrical.

When I finally decided to sell, I replaced the crappy carpet, painted the walls beige and made a 5x profit.


> Toronto is mostly made up of 100-year-old brick houses

That's true for inner Toronto but not for the suburbs as manishsharan suggested. Newer developer-built-subdivision wood-frame rules out there.


Yeah, fair point. Mississauga mostly dates to the mid-70s and has some truly terrible construction.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: