Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The 486sx, at least at the start, did not have a coprocessor at all.



The 486DX was the original 486 and it definitely did include an FPU. The FPU-free 486SX came along a couple of years later. My recollection is that the SX was originally a way to make use of 486DX chips that failed manufacturing tests on the FPU; they'd disconnect the FPU portion of the die and sell the busted chips as "486SX". Same trick AMD pulled with the 3-core Phenom.


The 486dx did, which is why I specified 486sx.


My apologies; I thought you were making a comment which was intended to be relevant to the one you were replying to, which concerned the change from the 386 to 486DX. I am not sure what relevance the configuration of the later 486SX would have to the situation msisk6 described.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: