I always find this curious... In order to live minimally, your interests need to be minimal as well.
I'm a musician and woodworker that also enjoys electronics. It's very difficult to engage in these hobbies without having 'things' unless I'm lucky enough to pass along the burden of having these things to someone else who will let me have unrestricted access to them.
So this popular idea of 'living minimal' is unaccessible to me unless I wish to burden someone else with my hobbies, or to simply ignore my interests.
I still operate minimally in the constraints of that which I enjoy. Despite that, it requires a minimum of ~1200 sq/ft of space and 'things'. So it makes me wonder how minimally you need to live to be minimal enough to be considered minimal?
I'm a musician and woodworker that also enjoys electronics. It's very difficult to engage in these hobbies without having 'things' unless I'm lucky enough to pass along the burden of having these things to someone else who will let me have unrestricted access to them.
So this popular idea of 'living minimal' is unaccessible to me unless I wish to burden someone else with my hobbies, or to simply ignore my interests.
I still operate minimally in the constraints of that which I enjoy. Despite that, it requires a minimum of ~1200 sq/ft of space and 'things'. So it makes me wonder how minimally you need to live to be minimal enough to be considered minimal?