Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The parallels to other socialist countries are interesting: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Korean_won#History

In the 80s, North Korea issued separate types of "foreign exchange certificates" based on whether you were from a socialist or a capitalist country. Andrew Holloway describes the arcane system in "A Year in Pyongyang." Local currency could buy a few simple things. The red won used by visitors from GDR or USSR could buy substantially more, but the blue won from capitalist countries was at a premium and allowed access to the best shops for tourists.

It reflects the awkward North Korean currency paradox: a hatred for the capitalist West but a deep need for Western capital.

It's fascinating and frustrating to me how much more there is to unwind from the Cold War. Lingering soviet satellites like Cuba, North Korea, Belarus, maybe Vietnam... all very different situations, but each has to grapple with its own basket of leftover problems from that era.

Hopefully Cuba will prove that softening relations provides a way out of some of these dilemmas.




I wonder how much of this came out of the USD being the international trading currency, thanks to the Bretton Woods system.


It'd be particularly ironic if Harry Dexter White nearly single handedly won the Cold War for the US while spying for the Russians. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Dexter_White

But you're right, I don't think it's completely far fetched.

On the other hand Bretton Woods probably wouldn't have had the same effect with just any global currency, the US did have a few perks (intact infrastructure, great mix of labor and capital, rising consumer class, demographic dividend, etc.)


It may have had an effect in the long run, but i think that in the short run the Marshall plan did more by getting Europe back on its collective feet.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: