Well, undoubtedly it does sound like everyone is getting funding, but I'd also caution you that the value of a startup is not always equal to the amount of coding involved.
I know of a startup/bootstrapped company whose product is incredibly simple code-wise (simply a web frontend connected to a wifi-enabled ticketing machine which is the interesting part), not "FizzBuzz" but less than two weeks' code, and they're solving real needs for their customers.
Should they be less worthy of seed funding than your (presumably complex) solution? Ok, so their barrier of entry is way lower, but I'd probably fund it (If I had any money that is :) ).
I know of a startup/bootstrapped company whose product is incredibly simple code-wise (simply a web frontend connected to a wifi-enabled ticketing machine which is the interesting part), not "FizzBuzz" but less than two weeks' code, and they're solving real needs for their customers.
Should they be less worthy of seed funding than your (presumably complex) solution? Ok, so their barrier of entry is way lower, but I'd probably fund it (If I had any money that is :) ).