Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
pronoiac
on Feb 24, 2015
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
Functional Pearl No.2 – The Max Number of Surpasse...
Ah! I missed the "whose indices are bigger" item in the description.
oltmang
on Feb 24, 2015
[–]
Crap, me too! It also would've helped if he provided an example where the answer wasn't also the min.
jacksontale
on Feb 24, 2015
|
parent
[–]
Yeah, you are right, the example number list in the post was not that awesome. If I am free at any time, i will modify the example. Just refining the diagram will be quite painful.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search:
