Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

[deleted]



What on earth? Google imposes non disclosure on ex-employees to mention by name in-house monitoring systems? (Presumably Borg-monitor?)

That strikes me as a bit paranoid, not letting the name of a monitoring system be revealed. Am I missing something?


Once I heard a urban legend about a programmer being sued because he was using mickeyMouse as a variable name.

I wouldn't be surprised if many of such cases of non-disclosure are to avoid hungry lawyers for trying to suck some blood out of rich companies. I guess the star trek franchise is owned by Paramount or something like this.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: