I am unsure of what you mean. I have no love lost for the author of that article: parts of that article are true but he seems clearly biased to the point of having included outright fabrications in other parts.

But, Gandhi is correctly spelt Gandhi in the article and not Ghandy or Ghandi as others often do.

Edit: Ah I see, the link spells it Ghandi. The article, however, gets it right.

What are the outright fabrications?

The implication that Gandhi supported Bose and his Indian National Army, as I mentioned in my comment below.

The article did not make any "outright fabrications" with regards to Bose, see my comment below.

The misspelling comes from the site mirroring the original article, not the author of the article itself. What specifically about the article do you think is factually incorrect?