Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

There is an obligation on the part of the executive to enforce the laws passed by congress. The constitution requires that he "take care that the laws be faithfully executed." Clearly there's some room for prioritization and allocation of scarce resources but he can't just ignore them. The Executive's check on the legislative branch is the veto power.



There are at least two was to interpret that phrase:

1 - he must take care that when the laws are executed, they are done so faithfully.

2 - he must execute all the laws, and do so faithfully.

The first of these interpretations does not require that every law be executed.


"The Executive's check on the legislative branch is the veto power."

The President also has the "power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States". Choosing not to enforce something is in fact a weaker exercise of power than pardon, as it preserves the ability of future administrations to prosecute current infractions.


There is a concept of prosecutorial discretion, and the current administration is not shy at all of using it.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: