Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> Consumer-unfriendliness: It's 2014. Why do I need to lug my power adapter with me? Couldn't we get a standard that worked with Dell, HP, IBM, and everyone else, and when I go to a conference, hotel, or family, I just plug into their adapter?

> (sans Apple)

Oh, is it like the mobile world is SO, SO MUCH better? Like Apple-only accessories? Apple-only cables (with specific, non standard ports)? How about changing the battery on the shiny MacBook? Well no luck, you have to bring it back to the Apple Store. That's unfriendliness to me.

I like it when people pay a grey picture of the PC world while Apple is all shiny on the other side, while having exactly the same practices or even worse.




Having been a Dell, Acer, and HP customer: yes the Apple world is so much better. It's staggeringly focused on a smooth customer experience. The other manufacturers are as well set up for customer friendliness as a kitchen appliance manufacturer, ie. Not at all / that's up to the retailers.

The points you bring up are rather suspect:

1. Besides the Lightning port, which was arguably created because dual-sidedness is a unique feature no standard has, what port is non-standard? MagSafe I guess - but it is pretty much standardized across their laptop lines and I still have a power supply from 2007 that work with my 2013 laptop using a $5 MagSafe 2 adapter.

2. How often would one take a laptop in for a new battery? It's a once in every 4 year event, at best. Pretty much never unless they bought it used.

I think there may be drastically different understanding of what customer friendliness is. At least with Apple I can talk to someone to fix my problem at the local mall, or have Apple support call me almost immediately with a specialist via their website -- as opposed to waiting on hold to talk to someone that knows nothing, only to be placed in another queue.


>2. How often would one take a laptop in for a new battery? It's a once in every 4 year event, at best. Pretty much never unless they bought it used.

Er, I have a MBP, but I buy exclusively used laptops. This isn't something to handwave. Many people do this. New prices are insane.


That's fair (I admittedly have always bought new and sold to the used market), though you might need a battery replacement in either case (requiring an Apple Store appointment, or in the case of a PC, ordering the part).


A 94 watt-hour T430 battery is $160 on Lenovo's website. Apple's battery replacement service for the 91 watt-hour battery on the MacBook Pro Retina is $199. Not a dramatic different in price, IMHO.


If I buy used laptops, do you really think I buy new batteries from the manufacturer? A fairer comparison is a highly-rated third-party seller for a similar battery.


>It's staggeringly focused on a smooth customer experience.

iTunes begs to differ... it was always total PITA to use.


There's a reason that no business will use Apple computers.

Apple lock-in is horrendous and nobody wants to be tied to a single provider for all their hardware.


This is far from try any longer. My current employer is about 75/25/5 OS X/Windows/Linux for end user machines. The Windows boxes are used by the business types, while the devs and designers use OS X. The prod systems are Linux, and the devops are also Linux.

This is for a Fortune-500 company.


Actually, my fine employer uses Macs for all engineering functions on desktops.


I am guessing this is because it is a off the shelf *nix.


Yes and no - they are a standard system that is popular, the laptops are relatively sturdy and the IT expertise on adminning macs is pretty widespread.

Note, look at how many startups and techies use macs as primary dev machines - most people in the tech "scene" seem to. Popularity and bandwagons have some level of merit.


> There's a reason that no business will use Apple computers.

You may wish to update your assumptions. That was a relatively viable statement to make in 2012. In 2014 -- with businesses like Google going effectively Apple-only -- it's not.


Do you have a source for this?


I suspect the whole thing is bordering on a tautology.

Most of what Google do involve the web. And most web design (note the design part) courses puts a focus on Apple products. This in part because they grew out of print media courses etc.



OS X is less than 10% global market share. I think my assumption is still safe in 2014.

https://www.google.com/search?q=os+x+global+market+share


You said "no business", as in n = 0. I provided a significant counter-example. n >= 1; therefore your assumption is false.


Anecdotal, but fwiw my last three jobs have been in 100% Apple offices. That's probably just working in tech, though.


Umm...no.

Some businesses do use Apple products (typing on mine right now) but the biggest reason most don't is their lock in to the Microsoft ecosystems. Most of them use Active Directory and have corporate standards that make them use Microsoft because their IT teams require it.


I walked around many a modern development shop, and it's often about 70% Apple since around 2008... Especially now with mobile development.

Traditional businesses have a Windows legacy to deal with, but that hasn't stopped the vast majority from adopting iOS in droves.


Well, FWIW within the Apple ecosystem it's pretty standardised: I pretty much know that wen I go to a coworking space someone will have on of the two cables to charge nearly all current Apple devices: MagSafe or Lightning. Sure, not an open standard, but widespread enough to be a de-facto "standard".




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: