It’s funny, because you’re not inclined to have a practical discussion rather than a philosophical one — my entire point is that by declaring that people are speaking the language ‘wrong’, you are yourself introducing the entire philosophical question of what ‘wrong’ means.
By declaring anything I'm introducing the entire philosophical question of what any word I use means.
We generally omit details of relative unimportance. In this case I suppose you think that the definition of "wrong" is very important to the discussion, whilst I think that the people I generally want to communicate with have a shared understanding of that concept.
We don't really have enough agreement over basic principles to continue the discussion.
By declaring anything I'm introducing the entire philosophical question of what any word I use means.
We generally omit details of relative unimportance. In this case I suppose you think that the definition of "wrong" is very important to the discussion, whilst I think that the people I generally want to communicate with have a shared understanding of that concept.
We don't really have enough agreement over basic principles to continue the discussion.