Your explanation does not seem all that accurate either.
What if pg/jessica had allowed a bunch of people to sit through interviews? Then, some administrative staff decides to kick out one guy.
That would be a more accurate description from what I read here(based on the OP + Seedcamp's response).
Philosophicals--like whether investors should be in the room or not--are totally irrelavant here. What matters is what was promised and whether Seedcamp broke that promise for one individual(for whatever reason).
It seems like Seedcamp has too many cooks in the kitchen. The whole idea of having "official" mentors seems to have backfired here. You have a mentor complaining that investors are treated better than them. The solution to that is to get rid of this whole "mentor" label.
You never hear much about weekly YC speakers. That YC keeps it a low key affair is telling I think.
reshma is not "administrative staff", she is the ceo
since the format is more formal than a sit down interview I imagine they didnt want to disrupt a team half way through a presentation to ask someone to leave.
What if pg/jessica had allowed a bunch of people to sit through interviews? Then, some administrative staff decides to kick out one guy.
That would be a more accurate description from what I read here(based on the OP + Seedcamp's response).
Philosophicals--like whether investors should be in the room or not--are totally irrelavant here. What matters is what was promised and whether Seedcamp broke that promise for one individual(for whatever reason).
It seems like Seedcamp has too many cooks in the kitchen. The whole idea of having "official" mentors seems to have backfired here. You have a mentor complaining that investors are treated better than them. The solution to that is to get rid of this whole "mentor" label.
You never hear much about weekly YC speakers. That YC keeps it a low key affair is telling I think.