Where is their release plan? The files don't say alpha anywhere.
Version control matters when you don't know who actually made the change. Are the changes signed? No. Besides, my main point was a lack of openness about code reviews. They're not public, and there's no evidence they are even done.
An accessible readable website happens to be important to people, and is a legal requirement in Canada. Documentation is important, and there is none on their website. How do we know what changes they made? Documentation is part of software, and they have none. Fail.
If they want to be jerks and bash other projects, they should be able to take crits themselves.
They clearly state in the article that there hasn't been much activity for periods of time. You can see yourself by looking at the project history in CVS.
How are OpenBSD bashing other projects? The only person bashing projects here is you, for spreading FUD and disinfo like "LibreSSL hasn't seen nearly any commits for 2 months and most of the work was done 5 months ago", because clearly you have no idea how to navigate a source directory and only looked at the top level. See: http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/lib/libssl/src/..., for example.
The documentation is largely identical with OpenSSL's currently, I presume. This will change once the new ressl API is introduced. No extra tests have been added because there are no new major components that need testing yet.
> An accessible readable website ... is a legal requirement in Canada.
Could you help me out with a pointer in the right direction to find/understand this legal requirement? I did a little googling, and could only find evidence of laws that restrict the government itself.
Version control matters when you don't know who actually made the change. Are the changes signed? No. Besides, my main point was a lack of openness about code reviews. They're not public, and there's no evidence they are even done.
An accessible readable website happens to be important to people, and is a legal requirement in Canada. Documentation is important, and there is none on their website. How do we know what changes they made? Documentation is part of software, and they have none. Fail.
If they want to be jerks and bash other projects, they should be able to take crits themselves.
They clearly state in the article that there hasn't been much activity for periods of time. You can see yourself by looking at the project history in CVS.