Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
otikik
on Sept 27, 2014
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
John Carmack on Inlined Code
The ones Karmack talks about. Several "concepts"(functions in this case) with implicit relationships (like what calls what, and in what order) are (sometimes) more difficult to process for a human brain than a huge block of sequential code.
eru
on Sept 29, 2014
[–]
Oh, ok. Thanks. I guess that's why we try to avoid unnecessary naming in Haskell, and if we can, just chain our functions like eg
bigFunction = someFunction callBack . otherFunction arg1 callBack2
Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search: