Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

He was given 6 months and should have taken it.

Many people who violate the law think what they did wasn't wrong, but this has no bearing in the matter when it comes to sentencing.




6 months and the status of convicted felon. This is not an easy thing to take.


He shouldn't have repeatedly broken the law if he wasn't prepared to deal with the legal consequences.


https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8345282

To this, I can only add that there are a lot of bad laws and even more, much more, bad prosecutions, so sounding like every prosecution is right and if you don't like it, just don't break the law, is not only sounding mean and morally obtuse, but also very uninformed.


Sorry but serving six months jail time (and most likely less) for repeatedly breaking and entering is perfectly reasonable to me and not obtuse whatsoever.

Most on HN are outraged with this type of sentencing because it's someone they liked, but if it was anyone else it would be perfectly acceptable.


Did you spend time in federal prison? Are you dealing with convicted felon status? You seem to be awfully quick recommending people to sit in jail and accept the life of a convicted felon. It's either you recommend it from experience of it not being a big deal, or it is the obtuseness.


I have not. Why? Because I don't repeatedly break the law, since I don't want to go to jail.

Hence my comment above, if you can't do the time don't do the crime.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: