I usually get that visceral reaction from pronoun heavy instructional material. I haven't decided if it is just a personal hang up or not.
It's usually possible to omit pronouns and end up shorter, maybe at the cost of ending up a little dryer:
"Welcome to the Rust guide. This is the place to learn how to program in Rust. Rust is a systems programming language with a focus on "high-level, bare-metal programming": low level control, but with zero-cost, higher level abstractions. We really think Rust is something special, and we hope you do too.
The guide starts with a traditional "Hello, World!" program. Next a quick detour to introduce "Cargo", a tool for managing and building Rust programs and libraries. Then it's back to the language."
If the guide actually builds something, the last sentence there could say "Then it's back to the language, starting with the basics and working up to <thing that is built>."
It's usually possible to omit pronouns and end up shorter, maybe at the cost of ending up a little dryer:
"Welcome to the Rust guide. This is the place to learn how to program in Rust. Rust is a systems programming language with a focus on "high-level, bare-metal programming": low level control, but with zero-cost, higher level abstractions. We really think Rust is something special, and we hope you do too.
The guide starts with a traditional "Hello, World!" program. Next a quick detour to introduce "Cargo", a tool for managing and building Rust programs and libraries. Then it's back to the language."
If the guide actually builds something, the last sentence there could say "Then it's back to the language, starting with the basics and working up to <thing that is built>."