Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

In the former study, if you read it carefully, Aerospike were essentially able to choose the hardware for the test.

"Anyway, the code is free to install, it's easy enough to validate the speed claims"

So why don't you do so and come back with your own results that can at least pretend to be neutral instead of spreading empty hype around here?




/me aerospike employee here - we did a live demo of running aerospike server on AWS EC2 during the fifth elephant last weekend at bangalore. The demo had 1M TPS and latency for 80/20 load (80% read, 20% write) was <1ms for >99.8% of queries.

This demo was done on 4 r3.4xlarge nodes - We did earlier runs on r3.2xl as well with similar results.

https://twitter.com/anshprat/status/492971667493122048

I didnt do a latency screenshot grab but those who saw the demo can comment..


"So why don't you do so and come back with your own results that can at least pretend to be neutral instead of spreading empty hype around here?"

I don't own a computer, unless you count the smartphone I carry in my pocket. I somewhat suspect I'm in the minority on this on a site like HN.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2025 batch! Applications are open till May 13

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: