Following your off-topic lead and lacking anything on-topic to say...
It seems to be very factual and describe what is with no editorialised position on whether anything is good or bad which reduces the opportunity for an exchange of valid viewpoints.
It might be that the article is interesting but without people feeling knowledgeable enough to add much. And if the article doesn't make any significant errors the knowledgeable people won't jump in with corrections.
It seems to be very factual and describe what is with no editorialised position on whether anything is good or bad which reduces the opportunity for an exchange of valid viewpoints.
It might be that the article is interesting but without people feeling knowledgeable enough to add much. And if the article doesn't make any significant errors the knowledgeable people won't jump in with corrections.