Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I've also seen a long-term upward adoption trend for Square in small businesses in my area. Some of these are at their first-time accepting credit cards, especially at local farmer's markets where Square's adoption has increased from a fringe payments player to near ubiquity (>90%) over the past three to four years. It's also been interesting to see an increasing trend in businesses switching to Square from traditional wired or wireless credit card systems.

Every time I hear that Square isn't doing well financially, my heart sinks a bit. From my experience, it seems that they're nailing an underserved market and greatly improving the experience for these small businesses and their customers.




> they're nailing an underserved market

There's a good reason the market is underserved. If it were wildly profitable to operate in that space, you'd see many more players.


I'm glad nobody told Larry or Sergey that before they started Google.


Sometimes it helps to do a little research before trying to make a clever retort. Wikipedia has decent coverage of search engines: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_search_engine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_web_search_engines

Go.com, Lycos, AltaVista, Excite, Yahoo!, Dogpile, Ask.com, Yandex and many other search engines existed before Google entered. Most were wildly profitable.


Sometimes it helps to read the articles you link to. None of them show that "Most were wildly profitable." In fact, those articles mention that search engines before google struggled to make money.


Search engines had a lot of competition?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: