Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

There is something to be said for companies doing one thing.

MySpace still exists. If MySpace (were still) part of a larger company, they probably would have been shuttered by now as irrelevant. As long as Facebook just has one thing, 'Facebook', it will also safely limp along long after it is the backwater of the internet, a place you can't believe still exists.




> There is something to be said for companies doing one thing.

The only real difference is instead of shuttering they pivot. The name sticks around but they still delete all your old stuff[1], so the effect is the same.

[1] http://techcrunch.com/2013/06/12/bring-the-blogs-back/


> There is something to be said for companies doing one thing.

Facebook doesn't want to "do one thing". The problem is, Facebook keeps failing at doing other things, so you never hear about them or remember them.

Hey, what do you think people remember best: The facebook phone or the iTunes social network?


But social networking is the core of what Facebook does, and that includes the failed phone. G+ is pretty much irrelevant to Google's core businesses, which are search and advertising.


Clearly, Google should just focus on their cars.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: