Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Bing was actually more accurate than DDG.

It provided a local apple store which I know of as the 5th result when DDG just showed the generic untargeted bing results.




Interesting - so you perceive non-anonymised results as better.

DDG's main drawcard is anonymity, and Google/Bing are hoping the masses will prefer customised results. So if your perception is common, DDG is in trouble.

Or perhaps they can find a way to provide location data in their anonymised searches.


Many of my friends, technical and non-technical, do prefer tracking precisely for this reason. They find it more convenient that the search engine knows their preferences, location, etc.


That's because DDG isn't geocoding you. "apple store" + ZIP or city name should work.


Yes, that "untargeting" would be the whole point of using "a search engine that doesn’t track you".




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: