Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It seems like the needed change there was not to alter the scope of what they would seize, but the scope of their definition of Intellectual Property. It's a little unclear from your post - is that what you got modified?



Their definition of "Intellectual Property" didn't change, but it didn't matter given the ways in which the term was used.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: