You might want to consider deleting this post and resubmitting anonymously. As it stands, your comment history reveals both your name and your employer's name.

That aside, my advice would be to move on if you're being offered significantly higher compensation for your work. Also it sounds to me like your work environment (i.e. your boss) seems to be having somewhat of a negative emotional effect - maybe it's best to leave rather than spend time feeling pissed off with the place? Life is short.

Thanks for the heads up. Not sure how to submit anon though.

Make a new account (all those "throwaway201404.." accounts you might see), and then submit with that

After thinking about this, if someone from my company were to read this they would be able to identify me. I'll take my changes I guess.

Indeed; a "negative" outcome wouldn't so negative in the greater scheme of things.

Best way is to create a new account and only use it for the one submission.

Does he pay a bonus? Seems low. I would leave - he doesn't deserve good people around him and apparently doesn't need someone as good as you say you are - otherwise he wouldn't take such a big risk with such a small bit of money from his point of view.

And yes I would just tell him "In order for me to stay here, I need X Y and Z."

Just be humble and matter of fact. If you think you deserve equity but the cap table can't support it, ask for the equivalent in bonus. However it sounds like you want an ownership stake at some level based on the level of input you give.

It's hard to start something from nothing and maybe he doesn't value you as an entrepreneur spirit and thinks you are a happy wage slave, and is just testing you spirit here. If you are that important to his growth, and you are willing to walk away - things might change very fast. Or perhaps you work a cog really well, need lots of org support around you to function and don't think that well on your own - and that is why he is toying with you. Or he's just a stupid founder, but if he's that successful, probably not.

He does pay a bonus, but it isn't defined, meaning I don't have objectives that I am trying to meet and based on those defined criteria a bonus is awarded. The bonus is historically pretty good (10-20 % of salary), but I hate the uncertainty. I'd rather have the income now.

Do you think it would be unreasonable to ask for a retaining bonus?

-After your update: I've noticed he likes to toy with people. Regarding my position, I'm the lead calculation architect (no one in-house is capable and the system is very complex). And we are thinking of creating a new software branching off the existing product (we have one product atm) that will address the market share we don't touch.

OK if there is a new product being designed off your core role - if you want more money - you need to engage yourself in more of a leadership role.

Do you have ideas of what will make success in this? And how you can build a team/organize the current parts and execute something FASTER? That will drive reveneue/market share/xxx quicker? Remember, the faster something is created (in a lean point of view) - the higher chance of success. Can you help up the % chance of success. If that is the case, present that case in a concise way from a business logic point of view, the details of the code/engineering are irrelevant at this point. And tie your compensation or ownership to executing this plan, and start thinking about Why, and Value to the business. Until you do that, you don't really deserve more money - as someone else is doing that thinking for you. Until you can understand the actual value to the bottom line you bring and Why things should happen - you are just a cog in a wheel. Maybe a really big important cog, but it's not even remotely close to your machine that you are a cog in. Make it yours, present it and convince them you can take a load off his mind. Then you can share in the executive pay. If you want more money as an engineer, you may have hit the glass ceiling here, and should join an org (google type) that rewards it's engineers in this way. And I mean think about the spirit of this rant - just start communicating from a value point of view (value in terms of bringing lift to the business in faster more meaningful concrete ways) - and things probably will change. Or you will leave and start something new because it's actually really fun to mix engineering skills with business building skills. ;) Go read ben horowitz's new book, might give you some light on your ceo's behavior.

I am hiring and training people, so I am in a leadership role already. I work closely with the CEO and CTO daily to design the software. I am constantly creating new efficiencies and I negotiate the business contracts with some of our largest clients (2M+ annual). I don't know how much more I could be considered a leader within this company.

did you bring those clients? why arnt you getting a commission then? you should be participating more than 20k. Why is 1% of profits only 20k anyway? and again to clarify, as another poster said - if profits are low because of growth - and you are there for growth - your deal should be in actual equity not just a profit percentage. you are there supporting the growth, you need the upside. that is the case. otherwise go elsewhere. cognitive dissonance is a bitch. you arnt being valued to what you think your value is.

Speaking from experience, my advice is to use your job title to land a better paying job at a different company and don't look back. It sounds like your predecessor figured it out. Now it's time for you to do so too. Don't negotiate a new deal at your current company. Take the new offer and focus your efforts there. It can be scary to leave a role you are comfortable in, but it's the step you need to take to grow your career. A $50k/year salary increase is a lot of money. Even after taxes, that alone would cover the mortgage payments on a nice house in many parts of the country.

Saying the company is on the verge of growth is common tactic that people like your boss use. It plays into the same psychological effects that cause people to overvalue things that they own. The pain of missing out on something seems greater than the upside of selling, even if you logically know it's not true. The truth is that if your boss is cheap and entitled, he will be that way even more so when the company is more successful. Don't be surprised if he starts doing things like giving himself a generous salary increase or investing in capital equipment before profits are computed. Also 1% of profits is likely worthless if he cashes out and sells the company (notice he didn't offer you true equity). Don't let that mirage fool you into getting the paid what you are worth in the market.

There's an obvious disconnect between describing your current role as 'critical' and the corresponding value the CEO recognizes in your compensation. The market is telling you that you're at least $50K subpar. That's some significant coin. Areas to explore-- A) how important is it to you to stay there? B) How much do they demonstrate they really want you. C) How much do you value your personal time? D) Would 8 weeks paid annual leave be worth a $50K trade-off?

You have several options in this situation as far as I can see:

1) Get a raise in equity - this is the option that you boss offered you. Say, that you negotiate a better offer (2%-3%). In this case, if I judge the numbers correctly, that will match your current salary to what other companies on the market are offering (the 30-50K). However, that will ONLY match those offers - your risk in this case so you would have to negotiate a lot more to take into account the risk difference (30-50K fixed vs 30-50K potential).

Even if you do that, you will still have the insane work hours, the feeling that you are not appreciated enough and the risk hanging above your head whether you will hit the target salary.

2) Get a raise with both equity and money - you could negotiate a 1% equity + a decent cash raise. It will be difficult if your boss is so stingy but it is worth the shot. Keep in mind again your risk vs reward. I would at least want a raise of 20K + the 1% equity. That would give you more than what the market is offering you.

However, the point above applies here as well although you will be in a better position this time since you will have some stable cash increase.

3) GTFO from there

I have dealt with bosses like that and, in my opinion, you run a good risk of not being happy there, burnout, loss of motivation, etc. Your boss seems not to value his employees very much and this will most probably never change. I can imagine that you will always need to chaise the market average (just like now) and negotiate to actually be paid an amount which you could easily receive elsewhere (judging by your offers). Granted, my views on this are a bit extreme (I think that an appreciate boss should offer you a raise instead of you having to ask for one) but that is my opinion.

My advice: go and check out some of your other offers - it is very likely that you will find a better paying job with less working hours. If you have worked heavy hours until now, this change will do wonders for you. Once you find a nice place, leave.

Edit: last paragraph

1) I am concerned with accepting this much risk. 2) This could be nice, especially if the company's profits were to skyrocket. However, my family has a few business owners and I know from experience profits can be low during explosive growth years. 3) I am strongly considering it. A few of my colleagues have similar fears.

This, unfortunately, is an all too common issue. My perspective is from that of a compensation consultant that has worked with a lot of private companies and start-ups (among others)

First you must address WHY your base pay is so far below market.

Next you must address the concept of the phantom stock and what it's true potential can be over whatever term they have offered (is it just for the upcoming year...is it forever?)

Next you need to understand what potential ownership would even offer. Is there any possibility of an exit/lquidity event in the foreseeable future? If not, cash probably makes more sense, unless the company offers a well-funded cash out potential or buy-back plan.

"Low-balling" base pay is pretty common. Many company find it hard to make significant pay increases to get pay in line for key employees. If you clearly explain your situation they may reconsider and offer something more useful

You may want to consider getting some professional help. I would recommend talking to Mary Russell (mary@stockoptioncounsel.com). I work with the corporate side of these equations. Mary works with the individuals. She may be able to help put together an argument that convinces the right people.

Sadly, sometimes walking away is the best option. I would recommend that you first make sure your other possibilities are exhausted.

If you've received starting offers 30k-50k more than you are currently being paid in a comparable/better company, you have two options:

1. Tell your boss you're getting an offer for 30k more. Ask for that amount or a considerably larger profit share. 30k in direct compensation is worth 60k in uncertain profit share (3.5%). If the profit share were high probability, he would offer you direct compensation instead because he would prefer a superior outcome for himself (higher profit).

2. Leave and work for the other company. 30k is a lot of money.

It's worth noting the offers are from companies in the same city. Anyways, I agree. The prospect of opportunity and ownership has always kept me attached this company, but it seems like they have been using it to bait me to the company.

Question to ask: How does it vest? Sometimes phantom stock is used as handcuffs, where you get 20% each year for the next 5 years.

Another question: Is it 1% of profits, or 1% of profit increases. I have seen both.

Thanks. I will research the answers to these questions.

If you have other offers (real offers, not just bluster from headhunters), you can leverage those in your request for a raise. If he thinks you're going to stay around, he has no reason to offer you a serious raise. Show him that you are able and willing to leave, and he'll have to decide if he wants to make a counter-offer to keep you.

Agreed. You are way more likely to get that raise if you show intent to leave by having an offer on hand. You can play the "I want to stay, but I have this great offer..." card and see if he bites.

You'll get that raise using this technique. You will then be fired the moment the boss can quietly find a replacement for you. And don't think he won't be looking.

Seriously, don't do this. Get the new position with a better salary and don't look back. Counteroffers never pan out for the employees, only management benefits.

I received a job offer and was truly considering leaving my position. I received a good counteroffer that included increased vacation time and addressed some of the reasons why I wanted to leave the position to begin with. I was there for another 2 years before leaving on my own.

If his employer is going to look for another person to fill the position then this is not the right place to work and there was no point in staying. I don't think he loses either way, but that was just my experience.

I think it's always best to be sincere. If you aren't really considering leaving, don't pretend you are. But if you have an offer and are considering it, don't be afraid to tell your boss so.

This is good advice, thank you.