Facebook has been playing this game for a while. They've also had Facebook Camera since mid-2012. It was clearly meant as a drop-in replacement for the iOS camera app, that just made it easier to upload your photos to Facebook.
Very interesting theory! Google must not have realized this because all of the google apps are in a single folder. Still, my home screen is 4 out of 20: Google folder, Gmail, Chrome and Authenticator.
Random question: Is Authenticator secure from Google themselves? I thought "yes," but after thinking a little more it seems like the answer is "maybe not."
What's to prevent an app like Authenticator from uploading its cryptographic seeds to Google's servers?
I was wondering why a company would invest resources into creating an app like Authenticator, which seems to have no obvious path toward monetization. But if the company who writes Authenticator can also spy on its users, then that might be the answer.
For most smartphones the number of icons that fit on a home screen is independent from the device type or the operating system on the device.
Different Android-based operating systems come with different UIs, and installing a new home screen UI on any of them is as easy as installing Angry Birds.
I know I shouldn't feed the trolls but let's all be clear iOS still has a large percentage of web traffic, app downloads, and money spent in the app store/in-app purchases and it's lead it actually growing.
It will hopefully reduce the memory and processing the main Facebook app leaves and at the same time it will give everyone a great opportunity to ditch the Facebook messaging service in favour of the plethora of other messaging apps already installed on their devices.
I, for one, will stop using the Facebook messenger entirely on my phone.
Will be interesting to see if they see this through. I might be missing something, but I don't see any business reason for them to do this. They will lose some users, and that seems a painful prospect for them. They value user bases so much that they paid $19B for Whatsapp.
Difficult to imagine them not reversing this decision at a later date.
Their purchase of whatsapp is exactly why they did this, IMO. I'd be very surprised if facebook messages doesn't become whatsapp and get completely tied into it. That's really the only way buying WhatsApp for $19B makes sense.
I've actually done the opposite, ditching facebook exclusively for the messenger app. I've yet to see something adopted so universally by the people I talk to most.
This is incredibly annoying. For the last couple of months the FB app has been switching me to the messenger app every time I accidentally hit the messenger button in the middle of the bottom navbar. And every single time it nags me with a full screen interstitial asking me to turn on notifications!!! Removing all FB apps now.
If the Messenger app will work without the Facebook app this could be a good thing? I would like to know about IMs people send me, but i have no interest in the stream of adverts and status updates...
I've been using the Messenger app exclusively for the past year, as I had no interest in looking through status updates or anything that the Facebook app did. Works wonderfully if you just want to respond to messages or send messages to people.
I've been using the two apps for a while now and I'm perfectly happy - the only annoying aspect is sometimes I have a little red notification counter above both apps when I receive a message.
The principle reason why I like the Messages app is that it's very fast to load - presumably because it isn't trying to download my friends' terrible photos and timelines and events and all the other junk that is in the main FB app.
I have tried and uninstalled Messenger a few times, it seems like a really bad user experience to be bounced out of the main app whenever you want to have a quick chat with someone.
Waiting for apps to multitask switch can get very irritating and I think for me it would mean I use Facebook chat less if anything.
I'm quite pleased about this actually. I find FB messenger to be annoying and I hate getting interrupted when I'm just popping into the FB app for a minute or two. This way I can leave it uninstalled entirely and check FB messages later from home.
For people like myself who have Facebook on my mobile but not the messaging app it means we now need to install it.
For some percentage of folks like myself that means we might start using facebook messaging more instead of using it as the messaging platform of last resort.
This is just an opportunity for Facebook to show twice as many ads as usual.
It's sad, but I really do feel bad for the people who use Facebook nowadays. When I have to look at the job market again, I'm really not looking forward to having to (a) sign up in the first place, (b) have that stupid like button following me around everywhere again and (c) have to become "friends" with people that I really don't want to see anymore.
How does it let them show more ads? Users already spend a huge amount of their time on mobile devices in the Facebook app. One user can only pay attention to one app at a time.
I guess not on iOS, but on Android you have to go through a few more steps to "chat" -- home > messenger app > search contacts > chat, versus just tapping a button. That is 2 more screens worth of ads to go through.
There is absolutely fragmentation! What used to be one app is now three: Facebook (minus chat), Paper (with chat), and messages (only chat).
This time last year 2/3 of those apps did not exist. They have fragmented the user experience into entirely different apps. The concept you are mistaking for fragmentation seems to be the concept of duplication'. Right now all three apps do messaging and they will soon be reducing that number to two (Messages and Paper).
If Facebook would release 3 Facebook apps, where each has mostly the same features, but slightly different, and on top of that each requires a different user/login, that's definitely fragmentation.
Say, you can argue WhatsApp and Facebook Messenger, or Instagram and Facebook picture posting represent fragmentation for Facebook, as they do mostly the same thing, but are each in their own space and with their own APIs and their own users etc.
Another example. iOS having lots of apps in one App Store is not "app store fragmentation". But Android having many separate app stores, many apps in each being the same (but tweaked or different versions) is "app store fragmentation".
Oh great, now there's a double whammy 40 MB + 40 MB for the stupid MqttPushService that is run twice by the Facebook and the Facebook Messenger apps.
Might as well not use Facebook on this 512 MB device. Why can't Facebook just implement push via GCM without sucking all the memory and wakelocks itself?
