What this shows is a great disparity between companies, i.e. corporate culture apparently attracts and/or fosters bigotry. (Intel, wtf?)
Which only supports the notion that Mozilla, given it's clear stance on equality and inclusiveness, should not be lead by a bigot like Eich. It was a completely inappropriate choice to begin with.
On a side note, I am disgusted by the way this is being artificially politicized by using terms like "progressive" and "liberal". Supporting equal civil rights for all is not a political view, not does being conservative mean being anti-gay.
This is not a political issue. You wouldn't call someone who is against institutionalized racism a "liberal" or "progressive".
The attempts to frame bigotry as politics is probably the most sickening part of this whole debacle.
Which only supports the notion that Mozilla, given it's clear stance on equality and inclusiveness, should not be lead by a bigot like Eich. It was a completely inappropriate choice to begin with.
On a side note, I am disgusted by the way this is being artificially politicized by using terms like "progressive" and "liberal". Supporting equal civil rights for all is not a political view, not does being conservative mean being anti-gay.
This is not a political issue. You wouldn't call someone who is against institutionalized racism a "liberal" or "progressive".
The attempts to frame bigotry as politics is probably the most sickening part of this whole debacle.