Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

And Debian got first release on August 16th, 1993; 20 years ago. It saved many from shareware/crapware app-colypse of 90s.

Am I the only on dreaming of Debian (an exactly Debian) developing an app repository (at least for Android), where free apps are carefully supported, building on top of each other where no tricks or crap exist.




F-Droid?

Yeah, it's not really "debian" per-se, and it has it's own issues, but it's close.


I'm looking forward to native Linux on a mobile platform. Preferably a tablet.


Google could help kickstart that ecosystem by offering a promotion category for "Best Free/Open Source apps" in Play. Only apps with a GPL compatible license and fully buildable from a public repo are eligible.


Why only apps licensed under a GPL compatible license? What about all the GPL incompatible free/open source licenses?


I'm not sure Google has the incentives in place to be interested in this, but it seems like a perfect fit for CyanogenMod as they try to grow as a platform.


The incentive is that Google will benefit form having an ecosystem of high quality apps. A good ecosystem lowers the bar to creating high quality apps - the non-app open source software ecosystem is pretty conclusive proof of that.

But you're right - CyanogenMod is probably a better forum for such an ecosystem to bootstrap.


Hmmm, maybe I should have appealed to Google's strategy rather than their incentives. An APT/RPM style model strikes me as counter to the prevailing direction that Android, and Google more generally has been moving.

I think that from their perspective, mass market users don't care about license terms or free-ness as in freedom. They seem to care about free-ness as in sticker price, even when it comes with prohibitive in-app purchase requirements. If we look at mass market targeted app stores based on APT-like repository systems, well, all we really have is the Ubuntu Software Center. And that isn't clearly better than the Android Market to the mass market user, and I would go further to claim that the inverse is true. So I can't see strategically why Google would change direction toward an Ubuntu Software Center style direction, and the higher quality but less user friendly APT/RPM/pacman is just a complete non-starter.

But CyanogenMod seems to have reached its market position by appealing to the ethics of openness. So it makes sense given their prevailing strategies. They also have a history of providing relatively open/customizable alternatives to Android components, and an app repository in the tradition of APT/RPM would fit right in with their past initiatives.


Sure, if instead of Android you mean a Linux distribution for phones


F-Droid is the best Android application repository around. It contains only free software.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: