> C and C++ are not the same which the author seems to think.
The part where he lost me was when he said this referring to C:
> Here we tell the interpreter that each point would have exactly two fields, x and y.
Maybe I misread that, but I don't think I did, he was referring to the C struct when he said that. It's one of those glaring mistakes that is hard for me to look past when someone says something like this.
The part where he lost me was when he said this referring to C:
> Here we tell the interpreter that each point would have exactly two fields, x and y.
Maybe I misread that, but I don't think I did, he was referring to the C struct when he said that. It's one of those glaring mistakes that is hard for me to look past when someone says something like this.