Missed the point. All W3C committee member influence the set of features covered by W3C standards. That's what the W3C committe is for.
But the allegation here is that Google is ignoring the standardization process and shipping features before getting signoff via a committee draft, and that's a bad thing. The MPAA can't ship features at all, so they would never have access to this trick without convincing a browser vendor to do it for them.
But the allegation here is that Google is ignoring the standardization process and shipping features before getting signoff via a committee draft, and that's a bad thing. The MPAA can't ship features at all, so they would never have access to this trick without convincing a browser vendor to do it for them.