Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Amazon's S3, which presumably has scale advantages over put.io, charges $80/TB/month just for storage. put.io charges only 60% of that with data transfer included. Based on that, I doubt your wishes will come true any time soon.



S3 is one of the most expensive ways to store and transfer stuff though. Not to say the original poster could find that pricing, but if S3 is your benchmark you can save a lot of money.


Can you name some good alternatives?


DreamHost's DreamObjects is pretty interesting -- it's much cheaper, and implements the S3 protocol so it's (mostly) a drop-in replacement.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: