That is actually more likely a good than a bad thibg. Here in Taiwan bitcoin was just recently classified as commodity like gold, instead of currency. This makes bitcoin businesses and local exchange, bitcoin atm possible, since if it was currency, one would have to get a bank license to do pretty much all that. Let's hope it stays this way, and things kick off. We will be doing some bitcoin+law events here in the Taipei Hackerspace.
A lot of things happening at the moment. ~3 weeks ago there was almost nothing, now I heard of 4 exchanges coming online around now or soon, bitcoin ATM is on the way, every week there's bitcoin meetup, just did my first purchase yesterday.
For the regulatory effect, one of the technologically very advanced law firm just did an assessment, it's in Chinese but they promised English translation in the coming weeks.
http://www.eigerlaw.com/zh/publications/cat_view/17-publicat... (Alex Tsai, December 2013, 比特幣之介紹及其交易在台灣法律環境之適用) Good to know that Bitcoin is 比特幣 in Chinese :) My email in the profile, can let you know when the English assessment is published.
Bitcoins were dealt a blow in Norway as the government of Scandinavia’s richest nation said the virtual currency doesn’t qualify as real money.
I don't see how this is a blow to bitcoin. All this does is leave the door open for people to use bitcoin and escape the tax system without being punished. If the government of Norway didn't accept the physical phenomenon of gravity, would gravity have "failed the test"?
The market is bitcoin's ultimate test. Not the government's recognition of it.
VAT is a tax paid by the consumer, and which is collected by the final seller (to the end consumer). A business which accepts bitcoins would be required to remit the VAT in an acceptable currency. If the business did not collect VAT from the customer, the payment of VAT would be borne by the business.
It's funny how media outlets often use pictures of gold coins with the Bitcoin logo on it to illustrate Bitcoin. If it doesn't have a physical representation they make one ;-)
Speaking of the dubious benefits of government regulations, Mike Cadwell just had to shut down his casascius coins business after FinCEN sent him a cease and desist letter accusing him of unlicensed money transmission. Note that Mike never accepted U.S. dollars for his casascius coins, so the only premium he got for his coins was in exchange for his coin's design and metals. So people were sending hims Bitcoins and in return they got Bitcoins plus a pretty gold/silver/bronze coin, clearly marketed as non-legal tender.
How anyone could consider this money transmission is beyond me. It's sickening hyper-regulation. And even more sickening is that the FinCEN rep stood in front of congress not even a month ago and assured congress how careful FinCEN was to not stifle innovation with overregulation. Admittedly, casascius coins aren't high technology (although they're very attractive), but the fact that FinCEN was so quick to crack down here does not inspire confidence at all.
How media outlets use images is often painful. New Zealand Herald, APN, is a good example of how to do it badly. Both their app and website are image centric. Images load slowly, and the text jumps as you are reading. Often it's just loading some crap stock image like a police car with lights on or other such filler content. If I wanted images, I'd go to a TV or video streaming news site. I'm trying to wean myself off sites that behave like NZ herald.
They're not actual bitcoins. The Bitcoin is a wallet embedded inside of a physical coin. You could take a picture of a USB key and call it a Bitcoin using that logic.
If they do not now they could, in the future, retroactively find you and tax you for gains on BTC since the ledger is public and traceable. If this really concerns you I suggest you read-up on Bitcoin Mixers / Tumblers - but be warned these services could be dubious and take your BTC for their own!
It irritates me when people talk about "bitcoins", plural. Bitcoin is so divisible that it really seems like more of a "stuff" that can't be pluralized, like sand or water[1].
I forgot where I read it but there was once a description of data that derided the term "datum", singular, to mean one data point. "To anyone who's ever worked with it, data is a _stuff_." Wish I could find the book or article.
[1] Yeah, you can use "sands" or "waters" in a somewhat poetic manner, but that definitely stands out as a special usage.
"datum" is pretty common in academic literature. Even more common is treating "data" as grammatically plural: e.g. "The data show..."
There are plenty of examples of plural mass nouns though, and they all have slightly different meanings than the usual sense of the word. peoples, monies, sands, waters, etc.
