Yes, that point definitely should have been qualified better. If the new tool is much better than preexisting ones in important ways, it probably isn't a waste of time, and it could very well be a key asset.
But he does have a point in that the majority of rewrites are not significant improvements; you have to look more closely to evaluate this.
But he does have a point in that the majority of rewrites are not significant improvements; you have to look more closely to evaluate this.