Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It could be that people are focusing on the ethics because the "meat and potatoes" of the story are stupid.

The author's main point is: if you're rich and famous, people are more likely to treat you as if you're rich and famous.

The author says you have to "make your own success," and as an example, he points to a "really bad metal" songwriter who was "in a band with a major rock star" and who helped to sell 20M records.

But surely not even the author believes for a second that this songwriter managed to sell 20M records "on his own." Surely there were publishers, promoters, record companies etc. involved, yes? If the songwriter in question was a surprise indie hit, surely the author would have said so?

I think the very idea that a business deal involving an advance payment is somehow a charitable cause ("asking for help") dramatically illustrates the the arrogance, the star-struck cult of fame and money that's brought the music business so low.




In the music industry, don't you have to pay an advance back?

Wouldn't that mean an already rich songwriter can pay it back, even if he bombs?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: