Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> AFAIC, nothing OP had to say mattered once I understood how he got his raw data.

Why does that make sense?




Perhaps data is only correct if it was acquired ethically? :/ Maybe the unethical collection of data introduces large margins of error from the ethic-goblins.


You're missing the point. It has nothing to do with the correctness of the data, and everything to do with the means used to collect it. See also: torture & search warrants.


Torture introduces possible error into data. So it's an extremely bad analogy.

Picking up a sheet of paper doesn't call the validity of the data into question. It's still the same data.


[deleted]


This is an inflection point. The thread only goes downhill from here.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: