Dude. Asking questions and offering constructive criticism is how we understand good science, improve bad science, and discern the one from the other. "Having a little bit of trust" instead of asking questions is exactly what scientists should never do.
The people in here who ask questions aren't scientists. Asking "but are you sure the sequence shows flight and not moving on the ground" for a bird that is widely known to never touch the ground is not constructive criticism, not good science, it doesn't improve anything, it just distracts from pertinent questions from knowledgeable people.
Good science is criticism from people who have some knowledge in the field. Otherwise you're no better than the client who tells the designer that making the page title blink would add a nice touch to the homepage.
> Asking "but are you sure the sequence shows flight and not moving on the ground" for a bird that is widely known to never touch the ground is not constructive criticism
"Widely known"? Are you reading the same article? No one had any idea this happened until this study.
> Asking "but are you sure the sequence shows flight and not moving on the ground" for a bird that is widely known to never touch the ground is not constructive criticism
"Widely known"? Are you reading the same article? No one had any idea this happened until this study.
